<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Supply Chain View &#187; statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/tag/statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog</link>
	<description>A closer look at the supply chain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hard stats, great presentation</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2009/05/hard-stats-great-presentation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2009/05/hard-stats-great-presentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Arrand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain News and Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Sigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying to present statistics in an interesting and engaging way is terribly challenging. In the supply chain world, we often have to communicate rather dry numbers that imply significant conclusions for how our business should be run. This has been kicking around the internet for some time now, so apologies if you&#8217;ve seen it before. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2009/05/hard-stats-great-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Excel files for Six Sigma and business statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2008/11/free-excel-files-for-six-sigma-and-business-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2008/11/free-excel-files-for-six-sigma-and-business-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Arrand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training and Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Sigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoy making useful things freely available on Supply Chain View, so it&#8217;s good to find other people doing the same thing. There are 57 useful business statistics Excel files to download from the McGraw Hill website (to accompany the book Complete Business Statistics by Aczel and Sounderpandian). Among others, there are calculations for testing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2008/11/free-excel-files-for-six-sigma-and-business-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More numeracy woes, bad news for supply chain skills</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/11/more-numeracy-woes-bad-news-for-supply-chain-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/11/more-numeracy-woes-bad-news-for-supply-chain-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Arrand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain News and Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numeracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Sigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#8217;ve been working from home a lot recently, I&#8217;ve had the radio on to give the office a bit of a &#8216;buzz&#8217; and today I overheard this story on BBC 6 Music. Camelot have withdrawn a lottery scratchcard because customers couldn&#8217;t work out when they had won. The customers&#8217; confusion stems from the concept [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/11/more-numeracy-woes-bad-news-for-supply-chain-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we have the numeracy for Six Sigma?</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/10/do-we-have-the-numeracy-for-six-sigma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/10/do-we-have-the-numeracy-for-six-sigma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Arrand</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain News and Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numeracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shingo Shigeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Sigma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a pretty depressing story in the Guardian a few days ago that proposes, in typical newspaper hyperbole, that Britain is in the grip of a numeracy crisis. For once, the concern is justified. According to the article, there are 3 times as many UK adults with poor numeracy than poor literacy. That&#8217;s 15.1 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/10/do-we-have-the-numeracy-for-six-sigma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

