<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we have the numeracy for Six Sigma?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/10/do-we-have-the-numeracy-for-six-sigma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/10/do-we-have-the-numeracy-for-six-sigma/</link>
	<description>A closer look at the supply chain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 13:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supply Chain View &#187; More numeracy woes, bad news for supply chain skills</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/10/do-we-have-the-numeracy-for-six-sigma/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Supply Chain View &#187; More numeracy woes, bad news for supply chain skills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=58#comment-75</guid>
		<description>[...] read the MEN article, as it is very funny, if rather depressing. I wrote only last month about how poor numeracy threatens the success of Six Sigma. But failure at this level of simple arithmetical ability would make even the &#8220;keep it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read the MEN article, as it is very funny, if rather depressing. I wrote only last month about how poor numeracy threatens the success of Six Sigma. But failure at this level of simple arithmetical ability would make even the &#8220;keep it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

