<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Royal Mail&#8217;s latest carbon reductions: green logistics or green-wash?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/09/royal-mails-latest-carbon-reductions-green-logistics-or-green-wash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/09/royal-mails-latest-carbon-reductions-green-logistics-or-green-wash/</link>
	<description>A closer look at the supply chain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 13:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Arrand</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/09/royal-mails-latest-carbon-reductions-green-logistics-or-green-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Arrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=55#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Hi Ross - glad you&#039;re still checking the blog.

I did some work for Royal Mail a few years ago, and their standard load unit was a specially-designed roll-cage (originally made to fit on mail trains). So load-unload times for double-deckers will be pretty good (better than two single-decked vehicles if you include time to drive in/out of dock). I&#039;d say this was one instance when cost, service and environmental concerns are well-aligned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ross &#8211; glad you&#8217;re still checking the blog.</p>
<p>I did some work for Royal Mail a few years ago, and their standard load unit was a specially-designed roll-cage (originally made to fit on mail trains). So load-unload times for double-deckers will be pretty good (better than two single-decked vehicles if you include time to drive in/out of dock). I&#8217;d say this was one instance when cost, service and environmental concerns are well-aligned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/09/royal-mails-latest-carbon-reductions-green-logistics-or-green-wash/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=55#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hi Martin ;-)

A few things stike me about this. How do dd&#039;s help the Royal Mail - if post that hard to stack? 
Also..
&gt;&gt;The simple fact is that a greener Royal Mail is probably a smaller Royal Mail,....
yeah but what about a slower one too? I wonder if by increasing the del time, if improvements could be made?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin <img src='http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>A few things stike me about this. How do dd&#8217;s help the Royal Mail &#8211; if post that hard to stack?<br />
Also..<br />
&gt;&gt;The simple fact is that a greener Royal Mail is probably a smaller Royal Mail,&#8230;.<br />
yeah but what about a slower one too? I wonder if by increasing the del time, if improvements could be made?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

