<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RFID tags get smaller &#8211; and more common</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/03/rfid-tags-get-smaller-and-more-common/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/03/rfid-tags-get-smaller-and-more-common/</link>
	<description>A closer look at the supply chain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 13:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: taktik(z) &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/2007/03/rfid-tags-get-smaller-and-more-common/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>taktik(z) &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplychainview.com/blog/?p=15#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] RFID tags get smaller - and more common 13Mar07   Hitachi have announced the smallest RFID chips to date - only 0.05mm x 0.05mm in dimension. They are so small that to the human eye they resemble particles of dust, and so thin they can be embedded in paper. Hitachi’s smallest RFID tag to date, the tiny Mu chip, is 64 times larger and has the same storage capacity as the new chip. The problem, as always with RFID, (more…) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RFID tags get smaller &#8211; and more common 13Mar07   Hitachi have announced the smallest RFID chips to date &#8211; only 0.05mm x 0.05mm in dimension. They are so small that to the human eye they resemble particles of dust, and so thin they can be embedded in paper. Hitachi’s smallest RFID tag to date, the tiny Mu chip, is 64 times larger and has the same storage capacity as the new chip. The problem, as always with RFID, (more…) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

